宁彧 王涛

内容提要 萨拉菲主义是国内学界持续关注的重大宗教、政治、安全问题。在对西方学界成果吸收、借鉴的基础上，国内学者从历史回顾的角度，实现了对萨拉菲主义宗教文化内涵的拓展与政治安全议题的回归。“历史说”与“现代说”、“组织形态”与“观念形态”、“纯洁派”与“政治派”及“圣战派”的重叠身份等的争论在西方学界早已有之，而国内学界则在“历史说”的基础上，基于观念形态与组织形态的双重认识，分析、梳理了萨拉菲主义在体系、单元层面的扩展与渗透，继而区分了由于载体与实践的不同而有所差异的萨拉菲主义演变机制，在注重时代特征的同时，避免了重陷西方“条块化”“标签化”的认知困境。 此外， 由于对萨拉菲主义宗教文化内涵的有益扩展，国内学界在政治安全领域形成了不同观点的交锋。其中，萨拉菲主义意识形态的形成与功能、萨拉菲主义与敏感地区的安全局势，既有经验层面上的分析，亦有理论层面上的思考，同样回避了对萨拉菲主义“过度安全化”的误区。

关键词 萨拉菲主义 意识形态 地区安全

Abstract: The salafism has been studied by domestic scholars in long term, including religious, political and security field. On the basis of absorbing and drawing lessons from the western academic achievements, the Domestic scholars who adhere to the “Generalized” analysis path so as to realize the expansion of the connotation of Religion-Culture and the return of the topic of Politics-Security. “Historicality” or “Modernity”, “Organization” or “Conception”, and the debate of classification method of “Purists”, “Politicos” and “Jihadis” about Sala-fism is continuously present in western academic field. From the standpoint of “Historicality”, the domestic scholars explained the expansion and penetration of Salafism at the level of system and unit, and then distinguished the different evolution mechanism of Salafism with different existent forms. These series of studies appreciated the characteristics of Salafism in specific era， meanwhile avoided the cognitive dilemma of “Categorization” and “Labelling” in western academic field. Not only that, as a result of the beneficial expansion of the connotation of Religion-Culture of Salafism, the domestic scholars formed different views in the field of Politics-Security. Among them, the generation and function of Salafism ideology, the security situation in sensitive areas with Salafism are analyzed not only in the empirical study, but also in the theoretical study, so as to avoided the misunderstanding of the “Excessive Securitization” of salafism.

Keywords: Salafism; Ideology; Regional Security